Editor choice

Hostinger vs Bluehost : 15+ Factors to compare both Hosting , Who will win ?

Wanna upto 30% cashback ! Sign-Up Now

Disclaimer :- This post may contain affiliate links that at no additional cost to you, I may earn a small commission. Read full privacy policy here.

5/5 - (3 votes)

Hostinger vs Bluehost: which one is best ?

In our Hostinger vs Bluehost comparison, I have analyzed the most important features of both providers. I have also discussed their pricing, usability, functionality, security, and customer service. These are the basics that will allow us to decide appropriately which provider is the best.

Both the hosting providers are very popular, and they are improving their services day by day to keep up with the competition. So if you ever come across a post asking for advice on choosing between these two providers hostinger vs Bluehost, you will read thousands of comments on its many advantages and disadvantages. The servants fight among themselves to the death.

But I have a better way to solve this once and for all until the service is updated in the future. I think if you read this hostinger vs bluehost post till last then you can easily get a clear vision on which Hosting provider is best , hostinger or bluehost ?

If we examine and compare each one, we will present a good analysis that highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each. that’s what I did. So read my Bluehost vs Hostinger comparison to find out which is the best game for your website.

Too much in hurry πŸ™‚ look at this overall Hostinger vs Bluehost comparison in short

On the basis of
Hostinger
VS
Bluehost
Hosting management
VS
Pricing comparison
VS
Account management dashboard
VS
Control panel comparison
VS
Advance hosting management features
VS
Uptime and response time
VS
Website speed
VS
Stress testing
VS
Website security
VS
Customer support
VS
back to menu ↑

Hostinger black Friday Sale : 80% Off on all hosting plan + Manual Cashback !Editor choice

Want flat β‚Ή500 as a cashback on Hostinger hosting purchase . Contact us for Cashback details Hostinger …
80% Off 10% Off Show Coupon Code
BF2021
Read full review
Offer valid till Diwali
back to menu ↑

Bluehost Howleeeen Celebrations|Up to 65% Off On HostingEditor choice

Valid for limited time only !
back to menu ↑

Hostinger vs Bluehost: Basic Information about these two companies

Hostinger and BlueHost are both popular choices, but the latter is more popular because it is an old and well-established company. Hostinger is known for its low prices and removes difficulties when it comes to performance. At the same time, Bluehost focuses on WordPress and business features but not on performance.

back to menu ↑

Now Let’s start the journey of : Hostinger vs Bluehost in detail

In this Hostinger vs Bluehost detailed comparison guide, we will compare both the hosting providers on the basis of :

  • Hosting management
  • Pricing comparison
  • account management dashboard
  • Control panel comparison
  • Advance hosting management features
  • Uptime and response time
  • Website speed
  • Stress testing
  • Website security
  • Customer support

Now let’s get started πŸ™‚

Hostinger vs Bluehost
hostinger vs bluehost
back to menu ↑

Hostinger vs Bluehost : hosting management – ease of use

After using Hostinger and Bluehost, I found them to be very easy to use. All have a basic, beginner-friendly dashboard. However, when Bluehost decided to add cPanel, Hostinger created its own control panel. It’s called HPanel, and it’s just as smart and functional as cPanel.

In fact, Hostinger and Bluehost have a lot in common when it comes to ease of use. However, their dashboard and control panel are different, and for a better understanding, I will talk about them individually.

Result :

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1 Point 0 Point
back to menu ↑

Pricing comparison

Hostinger is cheaper than BlueHost, with shared hosting rates starting at $1.39 per month, while BlueHost costs $3.95 per month. Hostinger also charges low fees for its delivery options. For example, VPS hosting starts at $3.95 per month, unlike Bluehost VPS hosting, which starts at $19.99 per month.

The main and most popular product of both providers is shared hosting. It is easy to use and generally meets the needs of small and medium-sized sites.

Both providers include free SSL certificates and the cheaper plans include a website limit. But the similarity ends here:

  • Hostinger’s Single ($1.39/mo) comes with 30GB of SSD storage and 100GB of bandwidth for about 10,000 viewers. This includes weekly backups and a professional email account.
  • Bluehost Basic (3.95/mo) comes with 50GB of SSD storage, unlimited bandwidth, an email account, and a free domain for one year.

Hostinger is pretty straightforward about bandwidth allocation, while Blue Host is still hiding under a true unlimited promotion. At the same time, Bluehost doesn’t limit the number of email accounts you can create and includes a domain name that can cost around $10 per year. With Hostinger you have to buy a domain, although weekly backups make up the price difference in my opinion.

Both offers are broad as far as storage space is concerned – with a website limit, you don’t run the risk of using up more than 30GB of storage anytime soon.

But no matter which provider you choose, you must set the longest billing period to receive the advertised price. In addition, it will increase after the upgrade.

It is very clear what the difference is in the prices. Even if you pay Hostinger upfront, the price is not as scary as it seems. As far as Bluehost is concerned, it is twice as expensive.

But a cheaper plan is suitable only for very small people. So what is the real best value for different users?

Hostinger has a total of 3 shared hosting plans. Prices range from $1.39 per month to $4.99 per month, which increases the server resource limit and adds additional extensions.

The affordable plan is really generous when considering the resources involved, but if you need more than one site – this is no longer an option. For businesses, the internal features and resources are great, but it’s also an option for larger business websites.

Personally, I think premium (2.59/month) is something that most consumers benefit from. Slightly more expensive than the basics, at 1, it allows you to host 100 websites with 100GB of storage and includes a free domain. If your website is relatively young, you may never need to update it.

Bluehost pricing
Bluehost Pricing

For Bluehost, the four shared hosting plans range from $3.95 to $13.95 per month. Each plan includes more server resources and additional features than ever before.

Like Hostinger, the cheaper plan is good but limited. For the most expensive – that’s a huge increase in price for a little extra cost. Choice Plus and Choice Plus are worth a look.

Plus it’s a great option in the long run, as it doesn’t limit the number of websites you can create. Choice Plus is a great option that adds some extra security with daily backups and domain privacy for just a dollar more than Plus. But this is only for the first billing period – the price difference will be noticeable in the update.

Obviously, Hostinger is the cheapest option here. Of course, such a low price amazes me that the suppliers cut corners. And that’s what the rest of the Hostinger vs Bluehost comparison will show us.

Result :

Looking at the overall price, Hostinger is very cheap. Especially when it comes to renewal rates. Other than that, both providers have very similar features, which makes Hostinger even better.

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1 = 2 Point 0+0 = 0 Point
back to menu ↑

Account management dashboard

Hostinger provides a simple and functional user control panel that gives you access to all the necessary website building and management tools. Although the Bluehost dashboard is easy to use, I found it to be more efficient than the Hostinger dashboard.

In one corner, we have the Hostinger control panel. it is so easy. What I love most about it is that it gives you access to tons of tools and tons of information, even if it’s free of any clutter. This is one of the few cases.

Hostinger hpanel dashboard
Hostinger Hpanel dashboard look

When you first log in, the dashboard is used to manage your hosting account – install WordPress, enable SSL, and complete domain registration. After that, it will be used for accounting – access to the main control panel or domain administration area.

In the other corner, we have the Bluehost dashboard. Not only is it easy to use and navigate, but I found it more effective than Hostinger Dashboard. It gives you access to administrative tools, suggested layout procedures, and some guidelines that will help you build your website.

Bluehost hosting dashboard
Bluehost dashboard

In fact, the Bluehost dashboard acts more like a dashboard than a navigable area. Here you can manage the important things – installing WordPress, accessing the administrative area of ​​each website you create, configuring SSL, adding domains and subdomains, or accessing paid email accounts.

If more advanced tools are not needed, all websites will be organized in this user interface, which makes Bluehost all the more interesting. However, if you want to make changes to the database and other advanced settings, the Advanced button will take you to cPanel.

Result :

Overall, I found the dashboard easy to use for both Hostinger and Bluehost. There was no problem with both movements. However, I have to give extra credit to Bluehost here as it has created a more efficient dashboard than Hostinger.

Winner – Bluehost
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 = 2 Point 0+0 + 1 = 1 Point
back to menu ↑

Control panel comparison

While Bluehost decided to integrate the traditional cPanel we all know and love, Hostinger chose to create its own control panel and renamed it hPanel. Inspired by cPanel. The only difference is that it is designed with beginners in mind. Not that using cPanel is a big challenge.

Hostinger hpanel look
Hostinger hpanel overview

Hostinger hpanel is used for all major website and hosting management tasks. This is where you can :

  • install a WordPress plugin
  • any other content management system,
  • add domains,
  • create subdomains,
  • access the file manager, and more.

This is the main difference from Bluehost, which only uses the Control Panel for advanced administrative tasks.

cPanel looks very clean and practical. It’s easy to navigate and find the tools you’re looking for. Inspired by cPanel, it has inherited a logical classification of tools, categorized under email, software, security, and other categories.

Additionally, Hostinger has added a WordPress admin area.

You can use this dashboard to log into the WordPress admin panel, enable security mode, manage to cache, or comprehensively update plugins.

Overall, the Hostinger dashboard is very clear, functional, and easy to use for beginners.

Bluehost cPanel may be more familiar to most of you, even with skins matching the provider label. It also provides access to other advanced hosting settings, such as file manager access, phpMyAdmin for databases, and free webmail client management.

Bluehost has changed a lot by adding cPanel to the admin area.

Bluehost Cpanel
Bluehost Cpanel

For example, it was decided that installing a standard one-click cPanel for WordPress and other applications is no longer enough and you will not find it in cPanel. In this case, you have to go to my site or marketplace.

The same applies to domain management – it’s no longer available in cPanel. Bluehost has built its own tool for these tasks, which you will find in the Domains section.

By removing similar items from cPanel, it becomes a truly modern tool. Not in terms of trouble to use, but not needed on a regular basis. New users cannot step in here.

Truth be told, the Bluehost dashboard is no longer as functional as all the necessary tools found in the original dashboard.

Result :

It is important to note that both Hostinger and Bluehost make their user interfaces easy to use and navigate. No matter what you try, you won’t have a problem. Still, in my opinion, Hostinger is the winner in this category. Because he used his resources to build his control room, he did so with beginners in mind. So, I’ll give it an A+ to try.

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 +1 = 3 Point 0 +0 + 1 +0 = 1 Point
back to menu ↑

Advance hosting management features

One area in which Bluehost really stands at the fore is the additional features that help manage websites. Bluehost includes things like site management and marketing management from the dashboard. Hostinger, on the other hand, can claim to have only one account sharing facility.

Hostinger has promised to add a website launcher for some time, but it still exists.

However, it has the facility of sharing the same account. You can add your team members to the account by providing their login credentials. Also, you can give them different privileges. For example, you may not allow them to use your billing details to purchase services. They can only access a specific website if they have more than one.

When it comes to privacy and security, this is an excellent tool.It can also be implemented as per the requirements of the administration. For example, you can self-host your customers’ websites and give them separate access to the control panel.

At the same time, Bluehost does not offer such a useful feature, but it is a big plus when considering the size of the site and the business features.

Sting allows you to create a unified version of your website for changes. It’s basically your secret playground that no one onlookers know about. If you like what you did – you can revert these changes back to the original website without any hassle.

Everything is managed from the WordPress admin panel via the Bluehost plugin. It only takes a few clicks and a few clicks to copy so the changes are reflected on your live website.

Additionally, Bluehost allows you to organize marketing for your website from the dashboard. Tools like Google My Business and Google Ads are integrated to make it easy to use.

Google My Business will list your site on Google Maps and help with ranking queries like “restaurants near me”.

There is a convenient Ads Manager located in the Google Ads Control Panel.

Although these tools are not modern, you can organize important aspects of marketing in one place. It is very easy and useful if you are a new business owner.

Overall, Hostinger is not as versatile with add-ons as Bluehost. It focuses more on protecting your account, while Bluehost helps with web development and marketing.

Result :

Overall, ease of use and hosting management are an uphill battle between Bluehost vs Hostinger. Both providers are very easy to use, but the difference is huge. Hosting can be pretty straightforward, including a traditional dashboard. Bluehost’s dashboard has centralized administrative features, but also provides access to cPanel, which can accommodate the navigation suite.

One additional thing to consider is the winner using Bluehost marketing management tools and site management.

Winner – Bluehost
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 +1+0 = 3 Point 0 +0 +1 +0+1 = 2 Point
back to menu ↑

Hostinger vs Bluehost: which one performance is Best?

In a performance comparison between Hostinger and Bluehost, Hostinger is a clear winner. It was fast, handled a lot of traffic, and even got a good amount of time out of Bluehost. In fact, supplier results are among the best in the industry. Bluehost, on the other hand, was pretty average.

back to menu ↑

Uptime and response time

I monitored Hostinger and Bluehost’s time and response times for about two months to see how reliable these providers are.

Hostinger uptime

Over the course of two months, Hostinger had no stops, resulting in a 100% uptime. It’s a good result, but don’t be fooled. 100% uptime is not possible in the long run as the servers require maintenance. So we may have a good time, but more accurate results will come out in a year or so.

As far as response times are concerned, Hostinger was very moderate, with an average response time of 511ms. At the same time, except for a large section, the pace was very stable.

Bluehost uptime
Bluehost Uptime

During the same period, Bluehost had a total of 6 stops and 11 minutes of delay. This is still a very trustworthy outcome, with a 99.99 percent uptime. This is a very real result, although there is still a lot of optimism about co-hosting.

Result :

The average response time was 361 milliseconds less than Hostinger’s. However, Bluehost was not stable – initially, it peaked at 500ms or 700ms and then stabilized at 300ms.

Overall, both providers have proven to be reliable, and that’s what’s important here.

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 +1+0 +1 = 4 Point 0 +0 +1 +0+1+0 = 2 Point
back to menu ↑

Website speed

To find out how fast Hostinger vs bluehost load websites, I built and tested similar websites. Hostinger’s results were twice as good.

When testing the speed, we see 3 things:

  • Large Content Graph – This shows how quickly a bulk of a website’s content loads. A score of 2.5 seconds is considered good.
  • TTFB shows how quickly the server initially responds – this can tell us if it’s a provider, or if the page loads slowly with a subject error.
  • Its full load time, of course, tells us that the website is 100% ready for clicking and scrolling.

The host was quick in every way. The longest guaranteed coating was 849 milliseconds with no room for doubt. The server responded very quickly at first, and TTFB was at 207ms. This indicates that the server itself is faster.

As far as the full load time is concerned, there was some delay in the LCP. It increased to 936ms. But why am I complaining here? How many great websites have you picked out in less than a second? The host is fast and that’s true.

Bluehost response time
Bluehost response time

Bluehost is very slow here. The largest coat had 1.8 seconds of material. We are up to standard, but there is more room for improvement than Hostinger. And I know why – Bluehost’s first server response, TTFB, was very slow at 1 second.

On the other hand, there is no further delay in the full load time, as it is the same as LCP – 1.8 seconds. Page loading is still very fast.

And I found out why.

Hostinger response time
Hostinger response time

Hostinger places great emphasis on performance. It implements various speed improvements on its servers, such as LiteSpeed ​​web server caching as well as pre-configured with the latest PHP versions. Additionally, it allows you to select server locations from 7 different data centers around the world, so it’s amazing if your visitors are located in a specific location. You can choose the server closest to it and get better speed.

As far as Bluehost is concerned, it uses old and reliable technology without coding in the latest stuff. So the caching is very basic, and the PHP version is being updated slowly. Furthermore, its servers are located only in the United States. So if your audience is in Europe or Asia, this may not be the best option for you.

Result :

Overall, both providers show good results in terms of speed, but Hostinger is still very fast.

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 +1+0 +1+1 = 5 Point 0 +0 +1 +0+1+0+0 = 2 Point
back to menu ↑

Stress testing

I sent 50 virtual users (bots) to see if the websites were good and whether they had a lot of visitors. This puts a lot of pressure on the servers, exposing all the problems of the providers.

The host passed the test. To understand the graph, look at the blue line – this is the speed and the gray line (these are the shoes). The blue line remains flat even when the number of visitors increases. Only a few tremors after that, but nothing to point out.

In contrast, Bluehost had over 50 visitors and failed the test.

Bluehost stress testing
Bluehost stress testing

The first test the provider passed was with 15 visitors. However, the Blue Speed ​​Line is packed to pieces and grows with the number of visitors. This means that Blue Host has slowed down a bit.

This shows that Bluehost servers are not as powerful as Hostinger.

But still don’t leave it on Bluehost.

50VU is the maximum we believe co-hosting providers can handle reliably. It is among the most expensive projects. 15VU can easily add 10k or 20k visitors a month – it’s a very popular website, obviously.

Hostinger stress testing
hostinger stress testing

So, while Hostinger promotes its competitors and looks bad, Bluehost does well in this category.

Result :

Overall, Hostinger is ahead of the competition in almost every aspect of performance. With 100% uptime, fast page loading, and powerful servers, Bluehost looks really bad. Meanwhile, Bluehost shows very mediocre results.

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 +1+0 +1+1+1 = 6 Point 0 +0 +1 +0+1+0+0 +0 = 2 Point
back to menu ↑

Website security

When it comes to security, both Hostinger and Bluehost include key features in their plans. None of them receive additional emails in this department. Any security improvements you want for your website must be sold.

What you get from both providers in terms of security:

  • Let’s install and upgrade the certificate.
  • Easy one-click installation of Cloudflare
  • Basic protection against spam
  • Server level security improved

If you want to see the difference between the two providers, you need to look at the more advanced features.

For one thing, Hostinger is very clear about weekly backups. Also, if you choose a Business plan, the weekly backups change every day.

Blue Host, on the other hand, is very much on this backup. The TOS claims that a backup has been made, but there is no clear indication as to when this happened or whether restoration is possible. We don’t even know where the backup is stored.

So, if you want some clarification, you need to buy a third-party security tool that costs $1.99 per month if you include it when you buy the plan. The Pro plan comes with a free backup powered by Code Guard, that’s all.

Result :

So, when it comes to security, neither Hostinger nor Bluehost Excel, giving me extra points to Hostinger for offering free weekly or daily backups. Other than that, both providers are very similar.

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 +1+0 +1+1+1 +1 = 7 Point 0 +0 +1 +0+1+0+0 +0+0 = 2 Point
back to menu ↑

Customer support

If you need help, Hostinger’s main option is 24/7 live chat while email is also available. Bluehost works 24/7 to ensure customer support via live chat, email, and phone. Both providers also have a knowledge base full of lessons and documents.

It was easy to determine which provider provided the best and most effective support. That’s all I have to give them. I raised a question about installing a third-party SSL certificate and let me start the game.

Hostinger customer support . Hostinger vs Bluehost .
Hostinger vs Bluehost chat support

My experience with Hostinger was generally good, with the only problem being that it takes an hour to respond. In this particular case, I waited about 20 minutes.

However, once the agent contacted me, it took me only a few minutes to answer my questions. She was very funny and explained everything in detail. I should add that this has not encouraged me to buy SSL from Hostinger even though this option is available. So Hostinger is very honest and helpful here and tries to ensure the best user experience.

In contrast, Bluehost was effectively faster. Within seconds an agent joined me. On the other hand, the answers were not so clear.

Bluehost customer support

At first, the proxy offered a helper with SSL, but the conversation quickly turned to a dedicated IP query. For what reason do I need SSL to get a dedicated IP to receive the key package?

So when the conversation started off well, I left more questions than answers. And this isn’t the first time – in my experience with Bluehost, most proxies are really useful, but they require additional services to be sold. Also, not everyone speaks English fluently, so misunderstandings like this are very common.

However, the proxy provides SSL configuration and this is important.

So while I had to wait a long time for a response from Hostinger, it was a great experience, and I got very straight answers. Bluehost was also fast and useful, but poor communication is a problem that providers still report.

Of course, live chat isn’t the only way to get help. You can also do some self-education in the field of knowledge. Both providers are well documented and have teachers.

Result :

Overall, there is no better provider when it comes to customer support. Bluehost is fast, but not every word is live while Hostinger is waiting for you to call agents. I still give the hostinger an additional point here, the agent was very helpful and instructs me on how to solve my problem clearly.

Winner – Hostinger
Hostinger Earned Bluehost Earned
1+1+0 +1+0 +1+1+1+1+1 = 8 Point 0 +0 +1 +0+1+0+0 +0+0+0 = 2 Point
back to menu ↑

Conclusion on hostinger vs bluehost battle

On the basis of
Hostinger
VS
Bluehost
Hosting management
VS
Pricing comparison
VS
Account management dashboard
VS
Control panel comparison
VS
Advance hosting management features
VS
Uptime and response time
VS
Website speed
VS
Stress testing
VS
Website security
VS
Customer support
VS
back to menu ↑

Hostinger black Friday Sale : 80% Off on all hosting plan + Manual Cashback !Editor choice

Want flat β‚Ή500 as a cashback on Hostinger hosting purchase . Contact us for Cashback details Hostinger …
80% Off 10% Off Show Coupon Code
BF2021
Read full review
Offer valid till Diwali
back to menu ↑

Bluehost Howleeeen Celebrations|Up to 65% Off On HostingEditor choice

Valid for limited time only !
back to menu ↑

Hostinger vs Bluehost FAQs

back to menu ↑

Hostinger vs Bluehost for WordPress. Which one is better?

Bluehost is great for WordPress. Even WordPress.org says so. Furthermore, Bluehost offers highly organized WordPress projects, and the WP interface is better than Hostinger.

back to menu ↑

Is it possible to get a free domain name with Bluehost and Hostinger?

Yes, you get a free domain name with both Bluehost and Hostinger, but subject to certain conditions. For example, Hostinger’s entry-level plan doesn’t have this feature. Furthermore, all shared hosting plans from both providers claim to offer a free domain name, but this is only for one year and applies to certain TLDs.

back to menu ↑

Do Hostinger and Bluehost allow their users to choose a specific data center?

Bluehost servers are located in the United States only, so the choice is not possible. Hostinger, on the other hand, has a selection of data centers in the United Kingdom, United States, Brazil, Netherlands, Singapore, Indonesia, and Lithuania.

back to menu ↑

Separate review of Hostinger & Bluehost

If you are still not satisfied by our comparison guide of hostinger vs bluehost . Then please check these separate review blog post of both Hostinger & bluehost hosting and then decide which is better for your business or blog website .

Subscribe to our list

Don't worry, we don't spam

5 Comments
  1. Hostinger gives much better offers on every special occasion This is best thing of hostinger

  2. In my opinion, hostinger is one of the cheapest and best hosting provider in market.

Leave a reply

Coupondedo.in
Logo
Register New Account
Reset Password